Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 145222

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : November | Volume : 17 | Issue : 11 | Page : LC15 - LC19 Full Version

Big Five Personality Domains and their Impact on Problematic Mobile Phone Use among Medical Students in a Rural Tertiary Care Centre in Tamil Nadu India: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: November 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/65823.18706
Tamilarasan Muniyapillai, Maniprabhu Selvaraju, Karthikeyan Kulothungan, Neethu George, Rock Britto Dharmaraj, K Nawin Jai Vignesh

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College Hospital, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, KAPV Government Medical College, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College Hospital, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College Hospital, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India. 5. Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College Hospital, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India. 6. Postgraduate Student, Department of Community Medicine, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College Hospital, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Tamilarasan Muniyapillai,
Door No. 8, D-Block, Staff Quarters, DS Medical College, Perambalur-621113, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: tamilarasan.mdcm@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The increasing usage of smartphones across the globe has resulted in considerable changes in people’s daily lives, especially in terms of personality traits among adults. Research shows that the Big Five personality traits influence Problematic Mobile Phone Use (PMPU).

Aim: To estimate the prevalence of PMPU using the Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale (MPPUS-10) and to evaluate the personality predictors of PMPU using the Big Five Inventory (BFI) questionnaire.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 289 medical students at a rural tertiary care centre in Tamil Nadu, India from November 2021 to April 2022. The questionnaire consisted of three sections. The first section collected demographic characteristics, the second section included questions on the MPPUS-10, and the third section contained questions from the BFI questionnaire. Reliability analysis was conducted to assess the internal validity of the MPPUS-10 questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis using principal component analysis with varimax rotation and Kaiser normalisation was performed to measure the structural validity of the MPPUS-10 scale. A multiple linear regression model was applied to determine the relationship between PMPU and the personality domains.

Results: The prevalence of PMPU among medical students was found to be 106 (36.7%). Spearman’s rank correlation revealed a negative correlation between agreeableness personality (r=-0.307, p-value <0.001) and conscientiousness personality (r=-0.369, p-value <0.001) with PMPU. Additionally, a positive correlation was observed between neurotic personality and PMPU (r=0.325, p-value <0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that agreeableness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism significantly predicted 44.4% of the scores on the PMPU (F=23.276, p-value <0.001 at the 1% level). Therefore, individuals with lower levels of agreeableness, conscientiousness, and higher levels of neuroticism scored higher on the MPPUS-10 scale.

Conclusion: The prevalence of PMPU among medical students was found to be high, requiring attention. Individuals with lower levels of agreeableness and conscientiousness, as well as higher levels of neuroticism, were more likely to exhibit PMPU.

Keywords

Addictive behaviour, Cell phone use, Personality inventory, Technology addiction

The smartphone’s versatility has led to it being heralded as the “Smart Revolution” of the modern period, as it has become an indispensable information and communication tool in daily life (1). According to the International Telecommunication Union indicator database, nearly 99% of Indians were expected to have access to a mobile cellular network with atleast 3G, and nearly 98% were expected to have 4G by 2020 (2). Mobile phones have been used for a range of purposes, including education, information dissemination, and the development and maintenance of social relationships. While cell phones have made many people’s lives easier, they have also had a negative impact on their physical, mental, and interpersonal well-being (3).

Excessive smartphone use that is accompanied by functional impairments in daily life and symptoms comparable to those seen in substance abuse disorders is referred to as “PMPU” (4). One to fifteen percent of young people and adolescents are said to have problematic mobile phones, spanning a broad range (5). Researchers have investigated why some adults are far more likely than others to become addicted to cell phones, given the growing popularity of smartphones in society (5). When looking at PMPU, it is critical to focus on teenagers and young adults. At this point in their lives, people are more likely to take risks. People in their late teens and early twenties have been found to be more likely to engage in harmful and dangerous behaviours (5). The source of these concerns is unknown, but it may be due to the user’s lack of self-control or their disregard for societal norms (6).

Although no clear diagnostic markers exist, there have been reports of parallels between PMPU and other addictive behaviours, such as smoking, drug and alcohol abuse, internet addiction, and compulsive gambling (7),(8). Extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience are the five major factors for measuring human personality (9), and they can be easily assessed using the BFI (10). PMPU was linked to the neuroticism and openness-to-experience characteristics of the BFI, according to a study conducted in Poland in 2021 (11). Similarly, a Japanese study discovered that PMPU was linked to extraversion, neuroticism, and openness to new experiences in BFI types (8). However, there are only a very few research studies that have looked at these connections (8),(11). With this background, this study aimed to estimate the prevalence of PMPU using the MPPUS-10 scale and to find the personality predictors of PMPU.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2021 to April 2022 among medical students studying at a tertiary care centre in Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India. Ethical clearance for this study was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee on Human Subjects (Approval No: IECHS/IRCHS/No: B.138).

Inclusion criteria: All medical students undergoing MBBS courses, from the first year to internship, were eligible to participate in the study. Students who owned a mobile phone or used a mobile phone for atleast one hour per day were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Students who were not available even after three visits were excluded from the study.

Sample size determination: The estimated sample size was calculated based on the prevalence of PMPU reported in a systematic review by Sahu M et al., (p=6.3%) with an absolute error (d) of 3% and a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) (12). The estimated minimum sample size was 252, and a total of 289 students participated in the study.

Data collection tools: Data was collected using a semistructured questionnaire administered through one-on-one interviews by the principal investigator. The questionnaire consisted of three sections. The first section collected demographic characteristics, the second section included questions on the MPPUS-10 scale, and the third section comprised questions from the BFI questionnaire. The BFI provides a quick, adaptable, and simple assessment of the five fundamental dimensions of human personality: neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness (10). The BFI questionnaire consisted of 44 items (BFI-44) and used a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 being “strongly disagree” and 5 being “strongly agree,” to measure extraversion (8 items), agreeableness (9 items), conscientiousness (9 items), neuroticism (8 items), and openness to experience (10 items). To score the BFI, reverse coding of negatively keyed items in the scale is necessary. The process involves subtraction of the obtained score from 6 for all the negatively keyed items. To calculate scale scores, the items corresponding to each Big Five domain are summed up. The process is outlined below, with reverse-scored items represented by R:

Extraversion: 1, 6R, 11, 16, 21R, 26, 31R, 36

Agreeableness: 2R, 7, 12R, 17, 22, 27R, 32, 37R, 42

Conscientiousness: 3, 8R, 13, 18R, 23R, 28, 33, 38, 43R

Neuroticism: 4, 9R, 14, 19, 24R, 29, 34R, 39

Openness: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35R, 40, 41R, 44

The prevalence of mobile phone addiction using the MPPUS-10 scale was measured. Foerster and colleagues created a shorter version (MPPUS-10) [1,13] that was quite comparable to the original MPPUS-27. The MPPUS-27, comprising 27 items, was initially created for use with adults before being endorsed and validated for use with people of all ages [13-15]. It consisted of only 10 short, easy-to-understand components. The maximum score on the MPPUS-10 scale was 100, with each of its 10 items scoring 10 points. The literature is ambiguous regarding which cut-off score should be used to identify PMPU, although Nahas M et al., proposed that a cut-off score of 59 should be used to identify PMPU for the short version of the measure (1).

Statistical Analysis

The internal validity of using the MPPUS-10 questionnaire in the present study was explored using reliability analysis by removing any of the items (questions) to obtain Cronbach’s α-value using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0. In this case, a Cronbach’s α-value of over 0.8 indicated good consistency in internal validity. To measure the structural validity of the MPPUS-10 scale, principal component analysis in conjunction with varimax rotation and Kaiser normalisation was performed in SPSS. The Bartlett’s test of sphericity was used to determine whether the results of factor analysis were worth considering and analysing. Through the rotated component matrix (principal component analysis), the MPPUS-10 scale was divided into three components: dependence, negative life consequences, craving, and peer acceptance. The sampling adequacy of this study was assessed using an index called the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure. A value above 0.5 can be considered acceptable and indicates that the data has adequate factorability.

A scree plot was used to identify the key components of the MPPUS-10 scale, which provides the Eigen value. If the value of any item or component was greater than one, then that item was considered an essential component of the scale. The scree plot shows the components on the X-axis and the corresponding Eigen values on the Y-axis (Table/Fig 1). A multiple linear regression model was applied to determine whether there was a relationship between PMPU and the personality domains. The R-squared value obtained from the above model indicates the strength of the relationship. The goodness-of-fit of the independent variables was explained using an adjusted R-squared value. The Durbin-Watson statistic was used to assess the need for autocorrection.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics: The mean age of the medical students was 20.92±1.686 years, ranging from 18 to 25 years. Among the subjects, 140 (48.4%) students were male, and the remaining 149 (51.6%) students were female.

Problematic Mobile Phone Use (PMPU): The mean total score of PMPU was 52.01±16.235. Using the recommended cut-off of 59, 106 participants (36.7%) fell into the category of PMPU.

Internal validity and factor analysis of MPPUS 10 scale: The Cronbach’s alpha score of the MPPUS 10 scale was 0.822, indicating good consistency. Therefore, the questionnaire was reliable for data collection. (Table/Fig 2) displays the mean for each item and the Cronbach’s alpha values of each individual item. All Cronbach’s α-values were equally good, ranging from 0.792 to 0.832.

The exploratory factor analysis was considered to be the most appropriate extraction method, combined with the rotation method, as the correlations between the components resulting from this analysis in the component transformation matrix were all greater than 0.5. The extraction value for question number 4 was 0.443, and it did not fit with any of the three components, so it was not included in the table. The output of the rotated component matrix is shown below in (Table/Fig 3).

The Bartlett’s test of sphericity showed a highly significant chi-square value of 948.755 with a degree of freedom of 45 and a p-value of <0.001, indicating that the results of factor analysis were worth considering in this research work. Through the rotated component matrix (exploratory factor analysis), the MPPUS-10 scale was divided into three components.

The first component consisted of three items (Questions 5, 6, and 9) and accounted for 40.05% of the variance. This factor was labeled “dependency” as these questions reflected the extent of mobile phone usage from the respondent’s perspective.

The second component consisted of four items (Questions 2, 7, 8, and 10) and accounted for 12.79% of the variance. This factor was labeled “negative life consequences” as the answers to these questions demonstrated the impact of chronic mobile phone use on meeting commitments, the cost of bill payment, and the respondent’s status when their mobile phone was unavailable or switched off.

The third component consisted of two items (Questions 1 and 3) and accounted for 10.84% of the variance. This factor was labeled “craving and peer acceptance” as these questions reflected the desire to use a mobile phone and the importance of peer bonding.

The KMO test value was 0.828, which was above 0.5, indicating that the data had adequate factorability. According to the Eigen values derived from the scree plot, the three components of the MPPUS-10 scale had values of 4.005, 1.279, and 1.084, which were above one. These three components accounted for 63.68% of the total variance in the current study.

Association of PMPU with independent variables: The independent t-test revealed no statistically significant association between age and PMPU (p-value=0.276). The prevalence of PMPU among medical students was higher among 64 (45.7%) males compared to 42 (28.2%) females, and the difference between these two proportions was statistically significant (p-value=0.002). The prevalence of PMPU among medical students was higher among third-year students (44.9%) compared to students in other years, and the difference between these proportions was not statistically significant (p-value=0.473) (Table/Fig 4).

Big five personality domains: According to the results obtained through the Big-BFI, the mean and standard deviation of each personality domain for the study participants are as follows: extraversion (24.43±1.907), agreeableness (32.03±16.235), conscientiousness (28.73±4.335), neuroticism (23.59±5.270), and openness to experience (33.34±4.142) (Table/Fig 5).

PMPU and big five personality domains: Spearman’s rank correlation revealed a negative correlation between agreeableness personality (r=-0.307, p-value=<0.001) and conscientiousness personality (r=-0.369, p-value=<0.001) with PMPU. There was a positive correlation between neuroticism personality and PMPU (r=0.325, p-value=<0.001). These results indicate that higher PMPU is associated with lower levels of agreeableness and conscientiousness, and higher levels of neuroticism (Table/Fig 5).

Regression analysis: The multiple linear regression model showed an R-value of 0.444, an R square value of 0.197, and an adjusted R square value of 0.188 (indicating a good fit). This means that the variation in the three personality domains accounts for 20% of the variation in PMPU. The Durbin-Watson statistic was 1.869, indicating no autocorrection. The multiple linear regression analysis revealed that agreeableness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism personality domains could significantly predict 44.4% of the scores on the PMPU (F=23.276, p-value=<0.001, at the 1% level). Therefore, individuals with lower levels of agreeableness and conscientiousness, and higher levels of neuroticism are more likely to score higher on the MPPUS-10 scale (Table/Fig 6).

Discussion

The present study aimed to estimate the prevalence of PMPU using the MPPUS-10 questionnaire and identify personality predictors of mobile phone problematic use using the BFI questionnaire. The findings showed that individuals with less agreeable personalities, less conscientious personalities, and more neurotic personalities were more likely to have PMPU. In terms of gender distribution among the medical students, the present study found an equal distribution between males and females. However, a study by Mangot A et al., conducted among 93 medical interns in Maharashtra found that about 63% of the participants were females (16). On the other hand, a study conducted in the same state in 2019 reported an almost equal gender distribution among medical students (17). Another study by Peterka-Bonetta J et al., conducted in the United States found that males had a higher level of smartphone addiction compared to females, with statistical significance (p-value <0.001) using the Smartphone Addiction Inventory scale (SPAI) (18). The present study also found a higher prevalence of PMPU among males compared to females, and this difference in proportion was statistically significant (p=0.002), indicating the need for further exploration of this concept in the future.

The present study reported a prevalence of 36.7% for PMPU among medical students. A similar finding was reported by Mangot A et al., in Maharashtra among 93 medical interns, where approximately 40% of them had PMPU using the Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version (SAS-SV) (16). Another study conducted among 195 medical students in Maharashtra in 2019 showed a higher prevalence of smartphone addiction (46.15%) using the SAS-SV (17). The heterogeneity in PMPU prevalence could be attributed to the use of different measurement scales or variations in mobile phone usage patterns. It has been suggested in the literature that internet use for activities such as gambling, chatting, gaming, and pornography may directly contribute to PMPU (19). Smartphones are believed to make work, education, and leisure activities more convenient.

The present study ensured the reliability of the MPPUS-10 scale, as evidenced by a Cronbach’s alpha score of 0.822. This finding was consistent with a study by Takao M in Japan, which reported a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.90 for the MPPUS-10 scale, indicating good consistency (8). Another study by Mach A et al., in Poland also assessed the reliability of the MPPUS-10 scale and found a statistically significant correlation between the MPPUS-10 scale and the Mobile Phone Addiction Assessment Questionnaire in their own language. The Cronbach’s alpha value in this study was 0.78, further confirming the reliability of the MPPUS-10 scale (15). A study conducted in Tehran also demonstrated good internal consistency of the MPPUS-10 scale, with a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.91 (20). Although there is limited research on the reliability of the MPPUS-10 scale in India, the findings of the present study support the existing evidence, suggesting that the scale is reliable for measuring PMPU among students, but further research is needed.

The analysis in the present study indicated that individuals with a less agreeable personality, a less conscientious personality, and a higher neurotic personality were more likely to exhibit higher levels of PMPU as measured by the MPPUS-10 scale. These personality traits are commonly associated with PMPU. The root characteristics of neuroticism often manifest as a strong superego, a sense of rejection, or social anxiety (21). It has been proposed that individuals with high scores on neuroticism may prefer online communication over offline communication due to social insecurity (22). The use of problematic mobile phones as a means of escaping social discomfort may explain this finding (23). Similarly, virtual communication may facilitate simpler interpersonal interactions by lessening the impact of a repressive superego. The present study found a negative and significant relationship between conscientiousness and PMPU. This finding can be explained by the characteristics typically associated with individuals with low conscientiousness, such as low prioritisation of duties and obligations, lack of planning ability, low self-control, susceptibility to temptations, and procrastination. It is worth noting that low conscientiousness was not considered relevant in Billieux’s framework (24), as this relationship has only recently been noted in the literature and may be influenced by the increasing “addictiveness” of cell phones due to the availability of freemium games and social media.

On the other hand, agreeableness was found to be a protective factor against developing behavioural addictions such as PMPU. Individuals with high scores in agreeableness are more likely to use problem-focused and socially supportive coping strategies when dealing with daily stressors, and they may be less inclined to use technology, such as smartphones, as an avoidance strategy (25). This suggests that agreeableness plays a role in avoiding interpersonal conflicts, which may contribute to lower levels of PMPU.

Previous studies have also demonstrated the interrelationship between the “Big Five” personality traits and behavioural addictions. Agreeableness and conscientiousness were found to be negatively correlated with Internet addiction, while neuroticism was positively associated with it (23). Similarly, neuroticism was positively associated with Internet addiction, while openness to new experiences, conscientiousness, agreeableness, and extraversion were negatively associated with it (19). The association between neuroticism, lower agreeableness, and Internet addiction has been established in other studies as well (26). Marengo D et al., also reported associations between conscientiousness, agreeableness, and neuroticism with problematic smartphone use (25).

Consistent with the present study, a study conducted in Poland by Demkow-Jania M et al., found that PMPU was associated with neuroticism and openness-to-experience personalities (11). Another study conducted in Japan by Takao M found that PMPU was associated with extraversion, neuroticism, and openness-to-experience personalities (8). These findings highlight the association between the “Big Five” personality traits and PMPU among students, which can aid in the identification of individuals at risk for PMPU.

Limitation(s)

This study, like other cross-sectional studies, has inherent drawbacks. The lack of a temporal association between personality development and smartphone addiction is a limitation. Longitudinal studies are needed to investigate these relationships over time, using different personality scales. Additionally, the external validity of the study may be impacted by the reliance on self-reported measures, which are susceptible to social desirability biases and diverse interpretations of item content.

Despite these limitations, the study demonstrates that the MPPUS- 10 scale is a reliable tool for measuring PMPU among students. This provides valuable information for early identification of individuals at risk for PMPU, supporting secondary prevention efforts.

Conclusion

The prevalence of PMPU among medical students was found to be high, indicating the need for attention and intervention. Two personality domains, namely agreeableness and conscientiousness, showed a significant negative correlation with MPPUS-10 scale scores, while the neuroticism domain showed a significant positive correlation. It is important to note that this study only focused on medical students. To obtain more generalisable results, future investigations should include larger samples from multiple centres and involve students of different ages. Additionally, it would be beneficial to explore the specific mobile phone activities that individuals engage in, such as social networking, messaging, emails, internet surfing, and gaming. By analysing these activities separately, predictive analytics can be computed for each type of activity, providing a more nuanced understanding of problematic mobile phone use.

References

1.
Nahas M, Hlais S, Saberian C, Antoun J. Problematic smartphone use among Lebanese adults aged 18-65 years using MPPUS-10. Computers in Human Behaviour. 2018;87:348-53. [crossref]
2.
International Telecommunication Union. Digital Development [Internet]. ITU, World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database. 2020 [cited 2022 Apr 7]. Pp. 2. Available from: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Dashboards/Pages/Digital- Development.aspx.
3.
Kim D, Lee Y, Lee J, Nam JEK, Chung Y. Development of Korean smartphone addiction proneness scale for youth. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):01-08. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Servidio R, Griffiths MD. Dark triad of personality and problematic smartphone use: A preliminary study on the mediating role of fear of missing out. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(16):8463. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Vally Z, El Hichami F. An examination of problematic mobile phone use in the United Arab Emirates: Prevalence, correlates, and predictors in a college-aged sample of young adults. Addictive Behaviours Reports. 2019;9(January):100185. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Bianchi A, Phillips JG. Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005;8(1):39-51. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Caplan SE. Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic Internet use. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007;10(2):234-42. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Takao M. Problematic mobile phone use and big-five personality domains. Indian J Community Med. 2014;39(2):111-13. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Brand M, Young KS, Laier C, Wölfling K, Potenza MN. Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders: An Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition- Execution (I-PACE) model. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;71:252-66. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Leung DYP, Wong EML, Chan S, Lam Th. Psychometric properties of the big five inventory in a Chinese sample of smokers receiving cessation treatment: A validation study. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice. 2012;3(6):01-10. [crossref]
11.
Demkow-Jania M, Kopera M, Trucco EM, Kobyliński P, Klimkiewicz A, Abramowska M, et al. Substance use disorder status moderates the association between personality traits and problematic mobile phone/internet use. J Clin Med. 2021;10(5):919. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Sahu M, Gandhi S, Sharma MK. Mobile phone addiction among children and adolescents: A systematic review. J Addict Nurs. 2019;30(4):261-68. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Foerster M, Roser K, Schoeni A, Röösli M. Problematic mobile phone use in adolescents: Derivation of a short scale MPPUS-10. Int J Public Health. 2015;60(2):277-86. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Montag C, Blaszkiewicz K, Lachmann B, Sariyska R, Andone I, Trendafilov B, et al. Recorded behaviour as a valuable resource for diagnostics in mobile phone addiction: Evidence from psychoinformatics. Behav Sci (Basel, Switzerland). 2015;5(4):434-42. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Mach A, Demkow-Jania M, Klimkiewicz A, Jakubczyk A, Abramowska M, Kuciak A, et al. Adaptation and validation of the polish version of the 10-item mobile phone problematic use scale. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2020;11:427. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Mangot AG, Murthy VS, Kshirsagar SV, Deshmukh AH, Tembe DV. Prevalence and pattern of phantom ringing and phantom vibration among medical interns and their relationship with smartphone use and perceived stress. Indian J Psychol Med. 2018;40(5):440-45. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Dharmadhikari S, Harshe S, Bhide P. Prevalence and correlates of excessive smartphone use among medical students: A cross-sectional study. Indian J Psychol Med. 2019;41(6):549-55. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Peterka-Bonetta J, Sindermann C, Elhai JD, Montag C. Personality associations with smartphone and internet use disorder: A comparison study including links to impulsivity and social anxiety. Front Public Health. 2019;7(JUN):127. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Kayis¸ AR, Satici SA, Yilmaz MF, S¸ ims¸ ek D, Ceyhan E, Bakiog? lu F. Big five-personality trait and internet addiction: A meta-analytic review. Computers in Human Behaviour. 2016;63:35-40. [crossref]
20.
Kalhori SM, Mohammadi MR, Alavi SS, Jannatifard F, Sepahbodi G, Reisi MB, et al. Validation and psychometric properties of Mobile Phone Problematic Use Scale (MPPUS) in University Students of Tehran. Iran J Psychiatry. 2015;10(1):25-31.
21.
De Vries MFRK. The dangers of feeling like a fake. Harv Bus Rev. 2005;83(9):108- 16,159.
22.
Ehrenberg A, Juckes S, White KM, Walsh SP. Personality and self-esteem as predictors of young people’s technology use. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008;11(6):739-41. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Andreassen CS, Griffiths MD, Gjertsen SR, Krossbakken E, Kvam S, Pallesen S. The relationships between behavioural addictions and the five-factor model of personality. J Behav Addict. 2013;2(2):90-99. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Billieux J. Problematic use of the mobile phone: A literature review and a pathways model. Current Psychiatry Reviews. 2012;8(4):299-307. [crossref]
25.
Marengo D, Sindermann C, Hackel D, Settanni M, Elhai JD, Montag C. The association between the big five personality traits and smartphone use disorder: A meta-analysis. J Behav Addict. 2020;9(3):534-50. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD, Karila L, Billieux J. Internet addiction: A systematic review of epidemiological research for the last decade. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20(25):4026-52.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/65823.18706

Date of Submission: Jun 05, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Aug 09, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Sep 23, 2023
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 05, 2023
• Manual Googling: Aug 25, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Sep 20, 2023 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com